Smart Extruder+ Puts Makerbot’s Testing Prowess to the Test

Taken from RapidReady

Posted by:Beth Stackpole

A rigorous testing process and tight collaboration with parent company Stratasys are the linchpins in Makerbot’s strategy to shore up confidence in its newly-designed Smart Extruder+ product, a replacement for a component that was the source of customer backlash last year and the genesis for a major companyrestructuring.

The Smart Extruder, announced with Makerbot’s 5th generation of printers back in 2014, was meant to be easy to use and allow users to swap out the part of a 3D printer that gets the most wear and tear. However, the component didn’t perform as expected, and customers complained that it clogged easily and had a short lifespan. Some reports said the original Smart Extruder had an 80% return rate when it initially shipped, which put the company in hot water with customers and was part of a string of problems, including a class action lawsuit, financial issues and layoffs.

Makerbot went back to the drawing board, and recently launched the Smart Extruder+, a redesign of the original part intended to be more reliable and longer-lasting than its predecessor. The new extruder maintains the key design points of the original, including the smarts (via sensors) to automatically detect when the printer’s filament runs out and alerting users via desktop or mobile apps, and is backward compatible with the existing architecture.

The Makerbot Smart Extruder+ features sensors to keep users apprised about print status as well as to improve print performance over time. Image Courtesy of Makerbot

The Smart Extruder+ boasts improvements in several key areas: reduced filament jams, better homing routines, reduced clogging, and improved connectivity. To address the clogging issues at the heart of the customer complaints, Makerbot engineers extended the PTFE non-stick surface tube used to feed filament into the nozzle, made software improvements to retract the filament less at different speeds, and enhanced the thermal management system, according to Michael Pappas, lead mechanical engineer on the project.

Testing was critical to make sure the new design functioned as intended and that production printers were built properly before shipping off to users. “Reliability was really important — we wanted to launch a product we could really stand behind,” Pappas says.

Finish Reading